M106, Quasars and cosmological distances

In January 2017, I was observing M33 from a calm suburban parking lot. My batteries were running low after a couple hours and I decided to finish the session with a couple quick test shots of M106.

https://astrovirusblog.wordpress.com/2017/01/27/a-glance-at-m106/

Take-home message was: “I want to revisit this galaxy with more exposure time, somewhere in April or May.”

Well, 3 years later I finally revisited M106. This time armed with better gear and a lot more experience. It’s really a fantastic galaxy. Large, bright, colorful and the background contains tons of other galaxies. On top of that, the core contains spectacular energetic jets, which I was able to enhance with my H-alpha filter.

M106_LHRGB_4
M106 in HaLRGB

André van der Hoeven and Mabula Haverkamp (the author of the popular astropixelprocessor software package (APP)) recently posted a collaborative image on the Dutch Astroforum.nl, where they were able to detect magnitude 22.5 galaxies. They used 27 hours of luminance data from light polluted backyards (SQM 19).

It was very intrigued by this and wanted to see how deep I could go with 6 hours of luminance data from my own suburban backyard, where light pollution is very similar.

The image below shows my inverted luminance with annotations from the SDSS R9 catalog. I used the data from the Sloan G-band filter, since it covers a good part of the visible spectrum (400 – 530 nm). Additionally, objects were filtered to include only galaxies instead of stars. The limiting magnitude of this image appears to be ~21.5, more than 1000 galaxies can be seen in the full field.

L_1170_GalaxiesGmag21_5
All galaxies in the field down to SDSS Gmag 21.5

Exploring the distance of objects was also an interesting journey. I learned how to calculate simple cosmic distances using Hubble’s law. You can calculate the approximate distance to most galaxies in the NGC and PGC catalogs by using their redshift and the following formula:

D = 3.26 × c × z / H0

Where
D = distance in million light-years (MLy)
c = speed of light (300 000 km/s)
z = redshift
H0 = Hubble’s constant (70 km/s/Mpc)
3.26 = Conversion factor for Mpc to MLy

Let’s illustrate this for the NGC and PGC galaxies in the image below. In case you want to try this out on your own data: I used SIMBAD to obtain the redshift measurements.

The tiny orange-red galaxies on the left side are more than 3 billion light years away from us. To put this into perspective, the famous Andromeda Galaxy is ‘only’ 2.5 million light years away from us.

M106_LRHGB_crop_Annotated

Identifier Redshift
Distance
(Million light years)
M106 (not visible) 0.001541 21.5
NGC 4248 0.001758 24.5
NGC 4231 0.02474 345
NGC 4232 0.02409 336
NGC 4226 0.02417 337
PGC2296601 0.02422 338
PGC213962 0.03068 428
PGC2297038 0.06679 932
PGC2300151 0.14582 2455
PGC2299019 0.26828 3746
PGC2299122 0.27315 3814

There was no data available for PGC2300125 and PGC2300116.

Finally, there’s the question: “what is the furthest object you can see in your photo?” To answer that, we have to look for objects with very high redshifts. Quasi-Stellar Objects (QSO), or more commonly known as quasars, are among the most distant objects we can see. They are often a hundred or even a thousand times brighter than a typical galaxy, but look like a dot or star in images due to their extreme distance.

So I went to VisieR and browsed the list of QSO databases. I downloaded Hewitt’s Revised and Updated Catalog of Quasi-stellar Objects (1993), which contains 24000 entries, and asked VisieR to calculate the J2000 coordinates of each object. Then I formatted the list and loaded it as a custom catalog into PixInsight’s annotation script.

My image contained 1 object from the Hewitt catalog. The catalog does not list any names, so I copied the coordinates and asked Simbad to look for know objects around these coordinates.

RHGB_Annotated_QSO
7C 121446.70+472852.00 – Magnitude 19.5 quasar – 12 billion light years away

The result: I found a quasar named 7C 121446.70+472852.00 on the right side of the frame (click the image above for full size, the quasar is annotated in white text). It looks like a magnitude 19.5 star but it’s actually much, much further away. The redshift is 1.13 and according to the calculator below, this object lies 12 billion light years away! http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.htmland

Hubble’s law becomes more complex for objects with redshifts >1. The fabric of space has been expanding while the quasar’s photons traveled through it, and the formula for distance calculation become quite complicated. There are even 4 different ways to express ‘distance’ at these scales. Cosmological distances are quite complicated and I’ve only barely scratched the surface trying to understand this deeply scientific topic.

Technical information:

Dates: 24, 25, 26 April and 2, 6 May 2020
Telescope: TS 8″ f/4 Newtonian
Camera: ZWO ASI1600MM-C
Filters: Astrodon 1.25″ LRGB E-series Gen 2, Ha 3nm
Mount: Skywatcher EQ6-R
Guide camera: ZWO ASI120MM
Accessories: ZWO EFW-8, ZWO OAG Gen2, TS GPU coma corrector
Software: PixInsight, Sequence Generator Pro, PHD2 guiding

Total exposure: 20.3 hours
Lum: 128×180″
RGB: 24×300″ each
H-alpha 3nm: 57×300″, 19×600″

4 thoughts on “M106, Quasars and cosmological distances

  1. This is just great! I just finished shooting my M106 in HaLRGB and I was looking online to find the furthest object in the image and I also have the 15 bly away quasar.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s